If you build it, he will come

Let sentences connect!

Go to Korean Version
Explore the Table of Contents


“If” is a conjunction. It is the very conjunction that appears among the eight parts of speech, namely nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections. Conjunctions are broadly divided into coordinating conjunctions, subordinating conjunctions, and correlative conjunctions. Most of this has been mentioned several times in previous writings. To review, it can be summarized as follows.

namesPurposeconjunctions
Coordinating Conjunctions Connect words, clauses, and sentences equallyfor, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
Subordinating Conjunctions Connect a subordinate clause to a main clausebecause, if, although, since, until, and while
Correlative Conjunctions Two or more words, including coordinating conjunctions, used in pairseither/or, neither/nor, not only/ but also


The conjunction “if” leads a subordinate clause with the meaning “if ~ then.” In some contexts, it can be thought of as a type of temporal adverbial clause led by “when.”

However, “if” often includes hypothetical situations, assuming things that are not as though they were, making it a bit special. We call the adverbial clause led by “if” a conditional clause, and sentences containing “if” are referred to as conditional sentences. So, “if” represents the event and the reason, and the main clause is the result.


  If it rains, you’ll be the first to know.


In Korean schools, conditional clauses with “if” are differentiated into present subjunctive, past subjunctive, and past perfect subjunctive based on the verb tense of the “if” clause. However, in English-speaking countries, they are most commonly categorized into zero conditional, first conditional, second conditional, third conditional, and mixed conditional, based on the verb tense and the meaning. Here, 0 to 3 can be thought of as the degree of remoteness from reality. For instance, 0 is reality, 1 is a possible reality, 2 is nearly impossible, and 3 is an absolutely impossible hypothesis.

<source:https://englishingeneral.com/if-clauses/>


If there is one principle concerning the tense of the subjunctive for if conditional clauses, it is that “time moves one step back.” Wishing for something that didn’t exist in the past to have existed, wanting something not present now to be as if it were, and speaking of something that might not exist in the future as if it does, it seems natural then that the tense of an if clause expressing speculation about the future or reality becomes present tense.

If the clause under “if” assumes the opposite of the present, it is expressed in past tense, and if it assumes the opposite of the past, it uses the “past perfect” tense.

Speculation about the future or reality: Present tense subjunctive

If + present tense, will + base form of the verb


Opposite assumption of the present: Past tense subjunctive:

If + past tense, would + base form of the verb


Opposite assumption of the past: Past perfect subjunctive:

If + past participle, would have + past participle

Let’s reduce the explanation and look for examples that fit here.

  1. Zero Conditional

    The zero conditional is used when the time being referred to is now or always, and the situation is real and possible. Therefore, both the condition and result clauses use the simple present tense. It can be thought of as not involving a change in tense since it deals with reality. In zero conditional sentences, the word “if” can often be replaced by “when” without a change in meaning.


Let’s listen to what Maximus, the protagonist of <Gladiator>, says.


Both the conditional clause (which includes “if”) and the main clause use verbs in the present tense. This is because such expressions do not involve situations or assumptions that are contrary to reality. The same applies to Lieutenant Colonel Slade’s philosophy on tango in “Scent of a Woman” and to the dialogue of Maria in “For Whom the Bell Tolls.”



2. Type 1 Conditional Sentences

    Type 1 conditional sentences are used to refer to the present or future in cases where the situation is realistic. It’s a story that’s realistically possible but doesn’t currently exist. Thus, the verb in the if clause uses the present tense, which is one step back from the future. Meanwhile, the main clause, or the result clause, is in the future tense.

    In the line from “Field of Dreams,” “If you build it, they will come,” the main clause uses a future tense verb, “They will come.” Therefore, semantically, the if clause should also be future. However, the if clause is expressed with a present tense verb.

    Similarly, “I will be back of you” is in the future tense. If the same tense should be used to indicate the same time, then the if clause should be “If I will hold you.” However, the verb in the if clause is using the present tense, which is one step back from the tense of the main clause.

    Let’s listen to the polite threat that Don Corleone, the godfather, makes to the people in the room to save his youngest son in the movie “The Godfather.”


    1. Type 2 Conditional Sentences

    Type 2 conditional sentences are used to refer to time that is now or anytime, and the situation is unrealistic. Naturally, it’s a situation that is opposite to reality. Therefore, even if the situation is in the present, the if clause uses a past tense verb. That’s why it seems they teach it as “past subjunctive” in school. Let’s listen to the following dialogue from “Rain Man,” where the doctor asks Ray.

    You don’t have any money right now and you’ve never used this money before. Saying “If you spent 50 cents” presents a clear hypothetical scenario, opposite to your current situation. In these scenarios, the if clause employs a past tense verb.

    Here’s another instance for clarity. The next quote comes from the lead character in Die Hard.

    Currently, there is no one to take over the dangerous task the protagonist is undertaking. Saying “If there was somebody” indicates a hypothetical scenario that is the exact opposite of the current reality. Since there is no one now, imagining the past is necessary to change the present. In fact, in the subjunctive past, what’s more important is not the verb in the subordinate clause but the verb in the main clause. In Die Hard, John McClane says, “I would let them do it.” Although “would” is the past tense of “will,” which indicates the future, its use here does not refer to the past but expresses regret with the modal verb meaning “would have.”

    In this way, using a modal verb that conveys speculation, like “would have,” in the main clause of a past subjunctive makes the expression more natural. Generalizing this a bit more, it can be summarized as <If + S + past tense verb (were…), S + past form of modal verb + base form of the verb>. The past form of the modal verb used in the main clause does not indicate past tense but expresses present forms of hope, expectation, or regret. Thus, it means that it can also be used in regular sentences, not just in subjunctive ones.



    would want’ is not just about wanting something; it includes the nuance of speculation, as in might want. What’s unique in the past subjunctive is that if you need to use the verb ‘be,’ you use ‘were’ regardless of the subject.

    In the example above, it’s natural for the clause following “if” to be expressed with a past tense verb. However, it’s written as “it were” instead of “it was.” This is because the verb from the subjunctive mood, not the indicative mood, is used. We will revisit this in the next article, “May the Force be with you.”

    1. Type 3 Conditional Sentences

    Type 3 conditional sentences are used to refer to a time in the past and to describe situations that are contrary to reality. These cases have zero connection to reality. Schools often call this the past perfect subjunctive. English uses the past perfect tense in the conditional clause and the conditional perfect in the result clause to express such situations. The conditional perfect refers to the form <modal verb in the past + have + past participle>. This type assumes something contrary to past facts, requiring a tense that steps back from the past, which ultimately needs to be the past perfect tense.

    Therefore, generalized, this can be summarized as [If + subject + had + past participle, subject + modal verb in past + have + past participle]. Note that while the form had + past participle must always be used in the first part, the main clause following must be in the form have + past participle, indicating that the tense of the main clause precedes.



    In the example above, there is no result clause. It’s just suggesting to imagine. The next example, on the contrary, lacks an if clause. Yet, it still uses the conditional perfect form to convey the speculative meaning of “might have done.

    Other conjunctions like “as if”, “unless”, and so on can also create expressions similar to conditional sentences. For example, “as if” or “as though” means “as if something is the case”, and “unless”, “providing” or “provided”, “suppose” or “supposing”, “though”, and “even though” are conjunctions that can be used. Below are some examples of such expressions.


    Comments

    답글 남기기

    이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다